RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
E8 Funding vs Matrix Executions
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
E8FD
E8 Funding
EST. 2021
MTRX
Matrix Executions
EST. 2018
E8 FUNDING
METRIC
MATRIX EXECUTIONS
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$25
MIN COST
—
3d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
E8 FUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- MARKETS
- Forex, Futures, Crypto
MATRIX EXECUTIONS DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
E8 Funding PROS
- +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $25 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
- +On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed or bi-weekly schedules.
E8 Funding CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 3% is significantly below the industry average of 7.9%, leaving very little room for loss.
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
Matrix Executions PROS
- +Founded in 2018, Matrix Executions has a longer operating history than most prop firms, suggesting stability.
- +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
- +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
- +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
Matrix Executions CONS
- −Almost no firm data is provided beyond founding year, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
- −Without profit split, funding, or challenge cost data, traders cannot evaluate value against industry benchmarks.
- −Lack of transparency on payout, drawdown, and trading rules limits trader decision-making confidence significantly.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy