RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

E8 Funding vs Lark Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

E8FD
E8 Funding
EST. 2021
LRKF
Lark Funding
EST. 2022
E8 FUNDING
METRIC
LARK FUNDING
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$400,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
$25BETTER
MIN COST
$200
3d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

E8 FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
MARKETS
Forex, Futures, Crypto

LARK FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex

E8 Funding PROS

  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $25 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
  • +On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed or bi-weekly schedules.

E8 Funding CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 3% is significantly below the industry average of 7.9%, leaving very little room for loss.
  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.

Lark Funding PROS

  • +Days to first payout of 1 is exceptionally faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
  • +News trading is permitted, giving traders additional strategic flexibility.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $200 is close to the industry average of $186.7, offering a recognizable entry point.

Lark Funding CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation harder to pass.

PROPDNA VERDICT

E8 Funding
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.
Lark Funding
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

E8 Funding Full Review →Lark Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy