RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

E8 Funding vs Lucid Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

E8FD
E8 Funding
EST. 2021
LCDT
Lucid Trading
E8 FUNDING
METRIC
LUCID TRADING
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
$25BETTER
MIN COST
$90
3d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

E8 FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
MARKETS
Forex, Futures, Crypto

LUCID TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower

E8 Funding PROS

  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $25 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
  • +On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed or bi-weekly schedules.

E8 Funding CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 3% is significantly below the industry average of 7.9%, leaving very little room for loss.
  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.

Lucid Trading PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
  • +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower

Lucid Trading CONS

  • No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
  • Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
  • Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures

PROPDNA VERDICT

E8 Funding
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.
Lucid Trading
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

E8 Funding Full Review →Lucid Trading Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy