RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

E8 Funding vs Funded Futures Network

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

E8FD

E8 Funding

EST. 2021

FFNT

Funded Futures Network

EST. 2022

E8 FUNDING

METRIC

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$400,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$250,000

$25BETTER

MIN COST

—$81

3d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER0d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

E8 FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
MARKETS: Forex, Futures, Crypto

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower

E8 Funding PROS

+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
+Minimum challenge cost of $25 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
+On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed or bi-weekly schedules.

E8 Funding CONS

−Overall drawdown of 3% is significantly below the industry average of 7.9%, leaving very little room for loss.
−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.

Funded Futures Network PROS

+Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
+Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.

Funded Futures Network CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
−Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
−Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.

PROPDNA VERDICT

E8 Funding

Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.

START WITH E8FD