RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

E8 Funding vs Audacity Capital

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

E8FD

E8 Funding

EST. 2021

AUDC

Audacity Capital

EST. 2012

E8 FUNDING

METRIC

AUDACITY CAPITAL

0/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER60/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER3.5/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$400,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$2,000,000

$25BETTER

MIN COST

—$42

3d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER0d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

E8 FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
MARKETS: Forex, Futures, Crypto

AUDACITY CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Static
MARKETS: Forex
PLATFORMS: MT5

E8 Funding PROS

+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
+Minimum challenge cost of $25 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
+On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed or bi-weekly schedules.

E8 Funding CONS

−Overall drawdown of 3% is significantly below the industry average of 7.9%, leaving very little room for loss.
−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.

Audacity Capital PROS

+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering exceptional capital access.
+Min challenge cost of $42 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
+Days to first payout of 0 allows immediate profit access, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, and fee refund is also offered, boosting net returns.

Audacity Capital CONS

−Overall drawdown of 15% is nearly double the industry average of 7.9%, exposing traders to significantly higher risk.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to complete evaluation.
−Market coverage is limited to Forex only, restricting diversification across asset classes.

PROPDNA VERDICT

E8 Funding

Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.

START WITH E8FD