RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
E8 Funding vs ATFunded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
E8FD
E8 Funding
EST. 2021
ATFD
ATFunded
E8 FUNDING
METRIC
ATFUNDED
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$400,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
$25BETTER
MIN COST
—$49
3dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—14d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
E8 FUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- MARKETS
- Forex, Futures, Crypto
ATFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
E8 Funding PROS
- +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $25 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
- +On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed or bi-weekly schedules.
E8 Funding CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 3% is significantly below the industry average of 7.9%, leaving very little room for loss.
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
ATFunded PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
- +EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
- +Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
- +Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.
ATFunded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
- −Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy