RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

E8 Funding vs Aqua Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

E8FD

E8 Funding

EST. 2021

AQUA

Aqua Funded

EST. 2023

E8 FUNDING

METRIC

AQUA FUNDED

60/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—59/100

3/5—

RATING

BETTER4/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$400,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$2,000,000

$25—

MIN COST

BETTER$1

3dBETTER

PAYOUT DAYS

—7d

—

PASS RATE

—

2TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE2

E8 FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
MARKETS: Forex, Futures, Crypto

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

E8 Funding PROS

+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
+Minimum challenge cost of $25 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
+On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed or bi-weekly schedules.

E8 Funding CONS

−Overall drawdown of 3% is significantly below the industry average of 7.9%, leaving very little room for loss.
−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.

Aqua Funded PROS

+Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
−Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
−Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

PROPDNA VERDICT

E8 Funding

Higher trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.

START WITH E8FD