RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Earn2Trade vs V Prop Trader

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

E2TR

Earn2Trade

EST. 2016

VPRT

V Prop Trader

EARN2TRADE

METRIC

V PROP TRADER

82/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER95%

$200,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$150

MIN COST

—

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER0d

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

EARN2TRADE DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Sierra Chart
TYPES: futures, beginner

V PROP TRADER DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
MARKETS: Forex, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, VTrader

Earn2Trade PROS

+Founded in 2016, making it one of the most established firms in the industry
+Min challenge cost of $150 is below the industry average of $186.7
+News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted
+Single profit target comparison: 10% is clearly disclosed, aiding trader planning

Earn2Trade CONS

−Reported pass rate of 9% is extremely low, meaning very few traders successfully get funded
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%

V Prop Trader PROS

+Profit split of 95% is significantly above the industry average of 84.7%, maximising trader earnings.
+Days to first payout of 0 means traders can access profits immediately, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Offers MT5 alongside the proprietary VTrader platform, providing at least one widely recognised trading environment.
+Covers both Forex and Crypto markets, giving traders access to high-liquidity and high-volatility asset classes.

V Prop Trader CONS

−No max funding, challenge cost, or drawdown data is provided for comparison against industry averages.
−Two steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring additional evaluation stages.
−Limited market coverage of only two asset classes may restrict diversification compared to broader offerings.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Earn2Trade

Higher trust score (82/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH E2TR