RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Earn2Trade vs QT Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Earn2Trade
E2TR
Earn2Trade
EST. 2016
QT Funded
QT
QT Funded
EST. 2023
EARN2TRADE
METRIC
QT FUNDED
82/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—72/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$200,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$150—
MIN COST
BETTER$12
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
9%
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

EARN2TRADE DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Sierra Chart
TYPES
futures, beginner

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

Earn2Trade PROS

  • +Founded in 2016, making it one of the most established firms in the industry
  • +Min challenge cost of $150 is below the industry average of $186.7
  • +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted
  • +Single profit target comparison: 10% is clearly disclosed, aiding trader planning

Earn2Trade CONS

  • −Reported pass rate of 9% is extremely low, meaning very few traders successfully get funded
  • −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%

QT Funded PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
  • +Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
  • −News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Earn2Trade
Higher trust score (82/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
QT Funded
Lower trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Earn2Trade Full Review →QT Funded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy