RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Earn2Trade vs Monevis

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Earn2Trade
E2TR
Earn2Trade
EST. 2016
Monevis
MNVS
Monevis
EST. 2023
EARN2TRADE
METRIC
MONEVIS
82/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—68/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER85%
$200,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$150—
MIN COST
BETTER$49
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER7d
9%
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

EARN2TRADE DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Sierra Chart
TYPES
futures, beginner

MONEVIS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex

Earn2Trade PROS

  • +Founded in 2016, making it one of the most established firms in the industry
  • +Min challenge cost of $150 is below the industry average of $186.7
  • +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted
  • +Single profit target comparison: 10% is clearly disclosed, aiding trader planning

Earn2Trade CONS

  • −Reported pass rate of 9% is extremely low, meaning very few traders successfully get funded
  • −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%

Monevis PROS

  • +Profit split of 85% is above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a slightly better earnings share.
  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA/automated trading are all permitted, supporting diverse trading approaches.
  • +On-demand payouts provide traders with maximum flexibility in withdrawing earned profits.

Monevis CONS

  • −Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting overall earning potential.
  • −Overall drawdown of 8% slightly exceeds the industry average of 7.9%, offering marginally less buffer.
  • −Founded in 2023, Monevis has a limited track record, which may concern traders prioritising firm stability.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Earn2Trade
Higher trust score (82/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
Monevis
Lower trust score (68/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Earn2Trade Full Review →Monevis Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy