RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Earn2Trade vs Funded Futures Network

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

E2TR

Earn2Trade

EST. 2016

FFNT

Funded Futures Network

EST. 2022

EARN2TRADE

METRIC

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK

82/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$250,000

$150—

MIN COST

BETTER$81

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER0d

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

EARN2TRADE DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Sierra Chart
TYPES: futures, beginner

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower

Earn2Trade PROS

+Founded in 2016, making it one of the most established firms in the industry
+Min challenge cost of $150 is below the industry average of $186.7
+News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted
+Single profit target comparison: 10% is clearly disclosed, aiding trader planning

Earn2Trade CONS

−Reported pass rate of 9% is extremely low, meaning very few traders successfully get funded
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%

Funded Futures Network PROS

+Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
+Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.

Funded Futures Network CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
−Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
−Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Earn2Trade

Higher trust score (82/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH E2TR