RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Earn2Trade vs Funded Futures Family
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
E2TR
Earn2Trade
EST. 2016
FFAM
Funded Futures Family
EARN2TRADE
METRIC
FUNDED FUTURES FAMILY
82/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$150
MIN COST
—
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
9%
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
EARN2TRADE DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Sierra Chart
- TYPES
- futures, beginner
FUNDED FUTURES FAMILY DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
Earn2Trade PROS
- +Founded in 2016, making it one of the most established firms in the industry
- +Min challenge cost of $150 is below the industry average of $186.7
- +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted
- +Single profit target comparison: 10% is clearly disclosed, aiding trader planning
Earn2Trade CONS
- −Reported pass rate of 9% is extremely low, meaning very few traders successfully get funded
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
Funded Futures Family PROS
- +US-based firm operating in a well-known financial jurisdiction.
- +No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
- +No platform or market data is provided to assess trading conditions.
- +No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.
Funded Futures Family CONS
- −Almost no operational data is available for Funded Futures Family, making meaningful comparison impossible.
- −Note: as a futures firm, drawdown is likely expressed in dollar terms and cannot be compared to the 7.9% CFD average.
- −Traders cannot evaluate profit potential or risk parameters without any disclosed key metrics.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy