RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Earn2Trade vs Audacity Capital

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Earn2Trade
E2TR
Earn2Trade
EST. 2016
AUDC
Audacity Capital
EST. 2012
EARN2TRADE
METRIC
AUDACITY CAPITAL
82/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
60/100
0/5
RATING
BETTER3.5/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$2,000,000
$150
MIN COST
BETTER$42
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER0d
9%
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

EARN2TRADE DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Sierra Chart
TYPES
futures, beginner

AUDACITY CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Static
MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT5

Earn2Trade PROS

  • +Founded in 2016, making it one of the most established firms in the industry
  • +Min challenge cost of $150 is below the industry average of $186.7
  • +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted
  • +Single profit target comparison: 10% is clearly disclosed, aiding trader planning

Earn2Trade CONS

  • Reported pass rate of 9% is extremely low, meaning very few traders successfully get funded
  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%

Audacity Capital PROS

  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering exceptional capital access.
  • +Min challenge cost of $42 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
  • +Days to first payout of 0 allows immediate profit access, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, and fee refund is also offered, boosting net returns.

Audacity Capital CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 15% is nearly double the industry average of 7.9%, exposing traders to significantly higher risk.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to complete evaluation.
  • Market coverage is limited to Forex only, restricting diversification across asset classes.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Earn2Trade
Higher trust score (82/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
Audacity Capital
Lower trust score (60/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Earn2Trade Full Review →Audacity Capital Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy