RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Earn2Trade vs Alpha Capital
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
E2TR
Earn2Trade
EST. 2016
ALPHA
Alpha Capital
EST. 2021
EARN2TRADE
METRIC
ALPHA CAPITAL
82/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—70/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$200,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$2,000,000
$150—
MIN COST
BETTER$50
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER2d
9%
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
EARN2TRADE DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Sierra Chart
- TYPES
- futures, beginner
ALPHA CAPITAL DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, DXtrade, cTrader, TradeLocker
Earn2Trade PROS
- +Founded in 2016, making it one of the most established firms in the industry
- +Min challenge cost of $150 is below the industry average of $186.7
- +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted
- +Single profit target comparison: 10% is clearly disclosed, aiding trader planning
Earn2Trade CONS
- −Reported pass rate of 9% is extremely low, meaning very few traders successfully get funded
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
Alpha Capital PROS
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7
- +Min challenge cost of $50 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
- +Days to first payout of 2 is well below the industry average of 6.5 days
Alpha Capital CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
- −Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy