RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Da Vinci Trading vs Lark Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

DVTD
Da Vinci Trading
LRKF
Lark Funding
EST. 2022
DA VINCI TRADING
METRIC
LARK FUNDING
43/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER59/100
4/5TIE
RATING
TIE4/5
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
MIN COST
$200
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
PASS RATE
1TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE1

DA VINCI TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

LARK FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex

Da Vinci Trading PROS

  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate

Da Vinci Trading CONS

  • No firm data was provided, making any meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible
  • Without metrics, traders cannot assess profit split, funding, drawdown, or payout terms
  • Lack of data is itself a transparency concern for traders making real financial decisions

Lark Funding PROS

  • +Days to first payout of 1 is exceptionally faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
  • +News trading is permitted, giving traders additional strategic flexibility.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $200 is close to the industry average of $186.7, offering a recognizable entry point.

Lark Funding CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation harder to pass.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Da Vinci Trading
Lower trust score (43/100). Slower payouts at —d.
Lark Funding
Higher trust score (59/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Da Vinci Trading Full Review →Lark Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy