RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Da Vinci Trading vs FuturesElite

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

DVTD
Da Vinci Trading
FTEL
FuturesElite
DA VINCI TRADING
METRIC
FUTURESELITE
43/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER59/100
4/5TIE
RATING
TIE4/5
PROFIT SPLIT
100%
MAX FUNDING
$150,000
MIN COST
$79
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
PASS RATE
1TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE1

DA VINCI TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

FUTURESELITE DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
Tradovate, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Atas

Da Vinci Trading PROS

  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate

Da Vinci Trading CONS

  • No firm data was provided, making any meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible
  • Without metrics, traders cannot assess profit split, funding, drawdown, or payout terms
  • Lack of data is itself a transparency concern for traders making real financial decisions

FuturesElite PROS

  • +Profit split of 100% is exceptional and far above the industry average of 84.7%, maximising trader earnings.
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, enabling faster access to capital.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to achieve.

FuturesElite CONS

  • Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • Overall drawdown is dollar-denominated at $2,000 and cannot be meaningfully compared to the percentage-based industry average.
  • No daily drawdown limit is listed, which may introduce uncertainty around intraday risk controls.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Da Vinci Trading
Lower trust score (43/100). Slower payouts at —d.
FuturesElite
Higher trust score (59/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 100% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Da Vinci Trading Full Review →FuturesElite Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy