RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Da Vinci Trading vs Funderpro

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

DVTD
Da Vinci Trading
Funderpro
FDRP
Funderpro
EST. 2023
DA VINCI TRADING
METRIC
FUNDERPRO
43/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER65/100
4/5—
RATING
BETTER4.78/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$200,000
—
MIN COST
$79
—
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
—
PASS RATE
—
1—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3

DA VINCI TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

FUNDERPRO DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader

Da Vinci Trading PROS

  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate

Da Vinci Trading CONS

  • −No firm data was provided, making any meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible
  • −Without metrics, traders cannot assess profit split, funding, drawdown, or payout terms
  • −Lack of data is itself a transparency concern for traders making real financial decisions

Funderpro PROS

  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $79 is well below the industry average of $186.7
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Four platforms supported (MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader) offering broad trader choice

Funderpro CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
  • −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing traders

PROPDNA VERDICT

Da Vinci Trading
Lower trust score (43/100). Slower payouts at —d.
Funderpro
Higher trust score (65/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Da Vinci Trading Full Review →Funderpro Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy