RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Da Vinci Trading vs Blueberry Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

DVTD
Da Vinci Trading
Blueberry Futures
BBFU
Blueberry Futures
EST. 2025
DA VINCI TRADING
METRIC
BLUEBERRY FUTURES
43/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER62/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
—
MAX FUNDING
$150,000
—
MIN COST
$184
—
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
—
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0

DA VINCI TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

BLUEBERRY FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
Blackarrow
TYPES
futures

Da Vinci Trading PROS

  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate

Da Vinci Trading CONS

  • −No firm data was provided, making any meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible
  • −Without metrics, traders cannot assess profit split, funding, drawdown, or payout terms
  • −Lack of data is itself a transparency concern for traders making real financial decisions

Blueberry Futures PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass
  • +Min challenge cost of $184 is just below the industry average of $186.7

Blueberry Futures CONS

  • −EA/automated trading is not allowed, significantly restricting algorithmic traders
  • −News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
  • −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days

PROPDNA VERDICT

Da Vinci Trading
Lower trust score (43/100). Slower payouts at —d.
Blueberry Futures
Higher trust score (62/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Da Vinci Trading Full Review →Blueberry Futures Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy