RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
DPFunded vs The Funded Trader
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
DPFD
DPFunded
TFTR
The Funded Trader
DPFUNDED
METRIC
THE FUNDED TRADER
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$600,000
$58BETTER
MIN COST
—$489
—
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
DPFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Commodities, Indices
THE FUNDED TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- PLATFORMS
- MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, cTrader
DPFunded PROS
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a faster route to capital.
- +Min challenge cost of $58 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7, reducing upfront cost.
- +Fixed drawdown type provides traders with clear and predictable risk boundaries.
- +EA/automated trading is permitted, accommodating algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
DPFunded CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, giving traders less room to absorb losses.
- −Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
- −News trading is not allowed and payout frequency is monthly, restricting strategy flexibility and delaying income.
The Funded Trader PROS
- +News trading is explicitly allowed, giving traders more strategic flexibility during high-impact events.
- +Offers three platforms including MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, and cTrader, well above typical single-platform firms.
- +Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, broadly in line with norms.
- +Max funding of $600,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7 but still a substantial capital allocation.
The Funded Trader CONS
- −Min challenge cost of $489 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7, raising the barrier to entry.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to pass evaluation.
- −Two steps to funded exceeds the industry average of 1.6, adding time and cost before reaching a live account.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy