RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

DPFunded vs OFP Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

DPFD

DPFunded

OFPF

OFP Funding

EST. 2021

DPFUNDED

METRIC

OFP FUNDING

0/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER60/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER3.5/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$400,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$200,000

$58BETTER

MIN COST

—$150

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

DPFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Commodities, Indices

OFP FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities
PLATFORMS: MT5, TradingView

DPFunded PROS

+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a faster route to capital.
+Min challenge cost of $58 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7, reducing upfront cost.
+Fixed drawdown type provides traders with clear and predictable risk boundaries.
+EA/automated trading is permitted, accommodating algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.

DPFunded CONS

−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, giving traders less room to absorb losses.
−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−News trading is not allowed and payout frequency is monthly, restricting strategy flexibility and delaying income.

OFP Funding PROS

+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
+Days to first payout of 2 days is well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making it easier to pass.
+News trading and weekend holding are both permitted.

OFP Funding CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Min challenge cost of $150 is above the industry average of $186.7 — close to average but notable.
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

PROPDNA VERDICT

DPFunded

Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d. 80% profit split.

START WITH DPFD