RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

DPFunded vs Earn2Trade

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

DPFD
DPFunded
Earn2Trade
E2TR
Earn2Trade
EST. 2016
DPFUNDED
METRIC
EARN2TRADE
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER82/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$400,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
$58BETTER
MIN COST
—$150
—
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
—
PASS RATE
9%
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

DPFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Commodities, Indices

EARN2TRADE DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Sierra Chart
TYPES
futures, beginner

DPFunded PROS

  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a faster route to capital.
  • +Min challenge cost of $58 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7, reducing upfront cost.
  • +Fixed drawdown type provides traders with clear and predictable risk boundaries.
  • +EA/automated trading is permitted, accommodating algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.

DPFunded CONS

  • −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, giving traders less room to absorb losses.
  • −Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
  • −News trading is not allowed and payout frequency is monthly, restricting strategy flexibility and delaying income.

Earn2Trade PROS

  • +Founded in 2016, making it one of the most established firms in the industry
  • +Min challenge cost of $150 is below the industry average of $186.7
  • +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted
  • +Single profit target comparison: 10% is clearly disclosed, aiding trader planning

Earn2Trade CONS

  • −Reported pass rate of 9% is extremely low, meaning very few traders successfully get funded
  • −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%

PROPDNA VERDICT

DPFunded
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d. 80% profit split.
Earn2Trade
Higher trust score (82/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

DPFunded Full Review →Earn2Trade Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy