DPFunded vs Apex Trader Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC	DPFunded	Apex Trader Funding ✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021
TRUST SCORE	40/100	59/100BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT	80%	90%BETTER
PAYOUT DAYS	—	8d
PASS RATE	—	31%
MIN COST	$58	$35BETTER
MAX FUNDING	$400,000BETTER	$300,000
RATING	0/5	2.75/5BETTER
REVIEW COUNT	0	3BETTER
STEPS	1-step	1-step
DRAWDOWN	Fixed	Trailing EOD

DPFUNDED DETAILS

+Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a faster route to capital.
+Min challenge cost of $58 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7, reducing upfront cost.
+Fixed drawdown type provides traders with clear and predictable risk boundaries.
+EA/automated trading is permitted, accommodating algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.

−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, giving traders less room to absorb losses.
−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−News trading is not allowed and payout frequency is monthly, restricting strategy flexibility and delaying income.

+Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
+Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps

−Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
−Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
−Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure

DPFunded

Lower trust score (40/100). Slower payouts at —d. 80% profit split.

Apex Trader Funding

Higher trust score (59/100). Faster payouts at 8d. 90% profit split.