RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

DNA Funded vs The Trading Pit

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

DNAF
DNA Funded
The Trading Pit
TTP
The Trading Pit
EST. 2022
DNA FUNDED
METRIC
THE TRADING PIT
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER74/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$5,000,000
—
MIN COST
$99
—
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

DNA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

THE TRADING PIT DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, Futures
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, NinjaTrader, Rithmic, cTrader

DNA Funded PROS

  • +No performance data is available to identify any above-average metrics for this firm
  • +No fee, payout, or structure data provided to evaluate competitiveness
  • +No platform or market data available to assess trading flexibility
  • +Country of operation (Australia) is noted, but no regulatory or structural data exists

DNA Funded CONS

  • −No data is provided for this firm, making any meaningful comparison impossible
  • −Traders cannot assess profit split, funding, or costs against the 84.7% and $186.7 averages
  • −Complete absence of data is a significant transparency concern for traders making financial decisions

The Trading Pit PROS

  • +Max funding of $5,000,000 is far above the industry average of $839,272.7
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Broadest market access listed, covering Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks, and Futures

The Trading Pit CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • −Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
  • −Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps

PROPDNA VERDICT

DNA Funded
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
The Trading Pit
Higher trust score (74/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

DNA Funded Full Review →The Trading Pit Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy