RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

DNA Funded vs Lucid Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

DNAF
DNA Funded
LCDT
Lucid Trading
DNA FUNDED
METRIC
LUCID TRADING
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
—
MAX FUNDING
—
—
MIN COST
$90
—
PAYOUT DAYS
1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

DNA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

LUCID TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, QuantTower

DNA Funded PROS

  • +No performance data is available to identify any above-average metrics for this firm
  • +No fee, payout, or structure data provided to evaluate competitiveness
  • +No platform or market data available to assess trading flexibility
  • +Country of operation (Australia) is noted, but no regulatory or structural data exists

DNA Funded CONS

  • −No data is provided for this firm, making any meaningful comparison impossible
  • −Traders cannot assess profit split, funding, or costs against the 84.7% and $186.7 averages
  • −Complete absence of data is a significant transparency concern for traders making financial decisions

Lucid Trading PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
  • +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower

Lucid Trading CONS

  • −No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
  • −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
  • −Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures

PROPDNA VERDICT

DNA Funded
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
Lucid Trading
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

DNA Funded Full Review →Lucid Trading Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy