RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

DNA Funded vs E8 Markets

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

DNAF
DNA Funded
E8 Markets
E8MK
E8 Markets
EST. 2021
DNA FUNDED
METRIC
E8 MARKETS
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER72/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$1,000,000
—
MIN COST
$58
—
PAYOUT DAYS
3d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

DNA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

E8 MARKETS DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

DNA Funded PROS

  • +No performance data is available to identify any above-average metrics for this firm
  • +No fee, payout, or structure data provided to evaluate competitiveness
  • +No platform or market data available to assess trading flexibility
  • +Country of operation (Australia) is noted, but no regulatory or structural data exists

DNA Funded CONS

  • −No data is provided for this firm, making any meaningful comparison impossible
  • −Traders cannot assess profit split, funding, or costs against the 84.7% and $186.7 averages
  • −Complete absence of data is a significant transparency concern for traders making financial decisions

E8 Markets PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $58 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry barriers.
  • +Max funding of $1,000,000 exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering strong scaling potential.
  • +Days to first payout of 3 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Wide platform selection including MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, and TradeLocker suits diverse trader preferences.

E8 Markets CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% falls below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing trader earnings.
  • −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing and position traders.
  • −Steps to funded is 2, above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages.

PROPDNA VERDICT

DNA Funded
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
E8 Markets
Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

DNA Funded Full Review →E8 Markets Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy