RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

DNA Funded vs Bulenox

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

DNAF
DNA Funded
Bulenox
BLNX
Bulenox
EST. 2022
DNA FUNDED
METRIC
BULENOX
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER71/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$150,000
—
MIN COST
$99
—
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

DNA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

BULENOX DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Tradovate
TYPES
futures

DNA Funded PROS

  • +No performance data is available to identify any above-average metrics for this firm
  • +No fee, payout, or structure data provided to evaluate competitiveness
  • +No platform or market data available to assess trading flexibility
  • +Country of operation (Australia) is noted, but no regulatory or structural data exists

DNA Funded CONS

  • −No data is provided for this firm, making any meaningful comparison impossible
  • −Traders cannot assess profit split, funding, or costs against the 84.7% and $186.7 averages
  • −Complete absence of data is a significant transparency concern for traders making financial decisions

Bulenox PROS

  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation easier to pass.
  • +Supports multiple platforms including NinjaTrader, Rithmic, and Tradovate.
  • +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted.

Bulenox CONS

  • −Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.

PROPDNA VERDICT

DNA Funded
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
Bulenox
Higher trust score (71/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

DNA Funded Full Review →Bulenox Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy