RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

DeiFunded vs FTMO

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

DEIF
DeiFunded
FTMO
FTMO
FTMO
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2015
DEIFUNDED
METRIC
FTMO
43/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER65/100
4/5TIE
RATING
TIE4/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
—
MAX FUNDING
$400,000
—
MIN COST
$155
—
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
—
PASS RATE
22%
1—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER2

DEIFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

FTMO DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Crypto, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5, cTrader
TYPES
forex, large-cap, multi-asset, Beginner Friendly, Pro Traders, Fast Payout, Large Cap, crypto

DeiFunded PROS

  • +No data is available to identify any pros for DeiFunded at this time.
  • +No platform or market information is provided to assess trading conditions.
  • +No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.
  • +No profit split or payout data exists to evaluate trader compensation.

DeiFunded CONS

  • −No data whatsoever is available for DeiFunded, making any evaluation impossible.
  • −Complete absence of key metrics such as drawdown, profit split, and funding is a significant transparency concern.
  • −Traders have no basis for comparison against industry averages with zero data disclosed.

FTMO PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.6%.
  • +Fee refund is available
  • +Founded in 2015, giving it one of the longest operational track records in the industry.
  • +Weekend and overnight holding is allowed during evaluation phases.
  • +A recently introduced competitive one-step program.

FTMO CONS

  • −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5.
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 8.0%, raising the qualification bar.
  • −News trading is not allowed at funded, restricting strategy options around major economic events.

PROPDNA VERDICT

DeiFunded
Lower trust score (43/100). Slower payouts at —d.
FTMO
Higher trust score (65/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

DeiFunded Full Review →FTMO Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy