RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

City Traders Imperium vs Finotive Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

City Traders Imperium
CTIM
City Traders Imperium
EST. 2018
Finotive Funding
FINO
Finotive Funding
EST. 2022
CITY TRADERS IMPERIUM
METRIC
FINOTIVE FUNDING
78/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—72/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$4,000,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$300,000
$129—
MIN COST
BETTER$49
1dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—7d
25%
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

CITY TRADERS IMPERIUM DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, advanced, large-cap

FINOTIVE FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex

City Traders Imperium PROS

  • +Max funding of $4,000,000 is vastly above the industry average of $839,272.7
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Founded in 2018, making it one of the more established firms in the industry
  • +On-demand payouts provide immediate access to profits

City Traders Imperium CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • −News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation

Finotive Funding PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Min challenge cost of $49 is significantly below the industry average of $186.7
  • +On-demand payouts offer greater flexibility than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, maximising trading flexibility

Finotive Funding CONS

  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
  • −Max funding of $300,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7
  • −Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps

PROPDNA VERDICT

City Traders Imperium
Higher trust score (78/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
Finotive Funding
Lower trust score (72/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

City Traders Imperium Full Review →Finotive Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy