RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Crypto Fund Trader vs The Funded Trader

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

CRFT

Crypto Fund Trader

EST. 2022

TFTR

The Funded Trader

CRYPTO FUND TRADER

METRIC

THE FUNDED TRADER

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$600,000

$5,000—

MIN COST

BETTER$489

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

CRYPTO FUND TRADER DETAILS

STEPS: -phase
MARKETS: Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5

THE FUNDED TRADER DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
PLATFORMS: MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, cTrader

Crypto Fund Trader PROS

+Crypto-focused offering provides niche market access unavailable at most prop firms
+Based in Switzerland, a well-regulated and reputable financial hub
+Founded in 2022, indicating an established operational track record
+Offers MT5, a widely used and trusted trading platform

Crypto Fund Trader CONS

−Min challenge cost of $5,000 is vastly higher than the industry average of $186.7
−Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
−No profit split, drawdown, or profit target data provided, limiting informed comparison

The Funded Trader PROS

+News trading is explicitly allowed, giving traders more strategic flexibility during high-impact events.
+Offers three platforms including MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, and cTrader, well above typical single-platform firms.
+Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, broadly in line with norms.
+Max funding of $600,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7 but still a substantial capital allocation.

The Funded Trader CONS

−Min challenge cost of $489 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7, raising the barrier to entry.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to pass evaluation.
−Two steps to funded exceeds the industry average of 1.6, adding time and cost before reaching a live account.

PROPDNA VERDICT