RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Crypto Fund Trader vs Audacity Capital
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
CRFT
Crypto Fund Trader
EST. 2022
AUDC
Audacity Capital
EST. 2012
CRYPTO FUND TRADER
METRIC
AUDACITY CAPITAL
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER60/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER3.5/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
$200,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$2,000,000
$5,000—
MIN COST
BETTER$42
—
PAYOUT DAYS
0d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
CRYPTO FUND TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
- MARKETS
- Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5
AUDACITY CAPITAL DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Static
- MARKETS
- Forex
- PLATFORMS
- MT5
Crypto Fund Trader PROS
- +Crypto-focused offering provides niche market access unavailable at most prop firms
- +Based in Switzerland, a well-regulated and reputable financial hub
- +Founded in 2022, indicating an established operational track record
- +Offers MT5, a widely used and trusted trading platform
Crypto Fund Trader CONS
- −Min challenge cost of $5,000 is vastly higher than the industry average of $186.7
- −Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
- −No profit split, drawdown, or profit target data provided, limiting informed comparison
Audacity Capital PROS
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering exceptional capital access.
- +Min challenge cost of $42 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
- +Days to first payout of 0 allows immediate profit access, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, and fee refund is also offered, boosting net returns.
Audacity Capital CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 15% is nearly double the industry average of 7.9%, exposing traders to significantly higher risk.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to complete evaluation.
- −Market coverage is limited to Forex only, restricting diversification across asset classes.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy