RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Crypto Fund Trader vs Aqua Funded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
CRFT
Crypto Fund Trader
EST. 2022
AQUA
Aqua Funded
EST. 2023
CRYPTO FUND TRADER
METRIC
AQUA FUNDED
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER59/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER4/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
$200,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$2,000,000
$5,000—
MIN COST
BETTER$1
—
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
—
PASS RATE
—
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER2
CRYPTO FUND TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
- MARKETS
- Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5
AQUA FUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker
Crypto Fund Trader PROS
- +Crypto-focused offering provides niche market access unavailable at most prop firms
- +Based in Switzerland, a well-regulated and reputable financial hub
- +Founded in 2022, indicating an established operational track record
- +Offers MT5, a widely used and trusted trading platform
Crypto Fund Trader CONS
- −Min challenge cost of $5,000 is vastly higher than the industry average of $186.7
- −Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
- −No profit split, drawdown, or profit target data provided, limiting informed comparison
Aqua Funded PROS
- +Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
- +Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.
Aqua Funded CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
- −Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
- −Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy