RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Crypto Fund Trader vs 3Red Partners

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

CRFT

Crypto Fund Trader

EST. 2022

3RED

3Red Partners

CRYPTO FUND TRADER

METRIC

3RED PARTNERS

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$200,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$5,000

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

CRYPTO FUND TRADER DETAILS

STEPS: -phase
MARKETS: Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5

3RED PARTNERS DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Crypto Fund Trader PROS

+Crypto-focused offering provides niche market access unavailable at most prop firms
+Based in Switzerland, a well-regulated and reputable financial hub
+Founded in 2022, indicating an established operational track record
+Offers MT5, a widely used and trusted trading platform

Crypto Fund Trader CONS

−Min challenge cost of $5,000 is vastly higher than the industry average of $186.7
−Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
−No profit split, drawdown, or profit target data provided, limiting informed comparison

3Red Partners PROS

+US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
+No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
+No platform or market data is provided to assess trading conditions.
+No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.

3Red Partners CONS

−Almost no operational data is available for 3Red Partners, making meaningful comparison impossible.
−No profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost are disclosed for benchmark comparison.
−Traders cannot assess trading conditions or earning potential without core metrics being provided.

PROPDNA VERDICT