RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Bullwaves Prime vs Aqua Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BWVP
Bullwaves Prime
Aqua Funded
AQUA
Aqua Funded
EST. 2023
BULLWAVES PRIME
METRIC
AQUA FUNDED
45/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER59/100
3.57/5
RATING
BETTER4/5
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
MAX FUNDING
$2,000,000
MIN COST
$1
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
PASS RATE
2TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE2

BULLWAVES PRIME DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

Bullwaves Prime PROS

  • +No data is available to identify any pros for Bullwaves Prime at this time.
  • +No platform or market information is provided to assess trading conditions.
  • +No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.
  • +No profit split or payout data exists to evaluate trader compensation.

Bullwaves Prime CONS

  • No data whatsoever is available for Bullwaves Prime, making any evaluation impossible.
  • Complete absence of key metrics such as drawdown, profit split, and funding is a significant transparency concern.
  • Traders have no basis for comparison against industry averages with zero data disclosed.

Aqua Funded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
  • Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
  • Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Bullwaves Prime
Lower trust score (45/100). Slower payouts at —d.
Aqua Funded
Higher trust score (59/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Bullwaves Prime Full Review →Aqua Funded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy