RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

BuoyTrade vs Savius

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BUOY
BuoyTrade
SVUS
Savius
EST. 2013
BUOYTRADE
METRIC
SAVIUS
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$1,024,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
$300,000
$50BETTER
MIN COST
$285
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER3d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

BUOYTRADE DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Static
MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT4

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS
ATAS, Quantower

BuoyTrade PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $50 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
  • +Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, offering a faster path to funded status.
  • +Max funding of $1,024,000 is above the industry average of $839,272.7, providing above-average scaling potential.
  • +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation stage easier to pass.

BuoyTrade CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
  • Overall drawdown of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, offering significantly less margin before breach.
  • EA/automated trading is not allowed, restricting algorithmic traders from participating with this firm.

Savius PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
  • +Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
  • +Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

  • Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
  • Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
  • Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

PROPDNA VERDICT

BuoyTrade
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
Savius
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

BuoyTrade Full Review →Savius Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy