RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
BuoyTrade vs One Step
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
BUOY
BuoyTrade
OSTP
One Step
BUOYTRADE
METRIC
ONE STEP
53/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—44/100
3.8/5BETTER
RATING
—3/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$1,024,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$50
MIN COST
—
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
2TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE2
BUOYTRADE DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Static
- MARKETS
- Forex
- PLATFORMS
- MT4
ONE STEP DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
BuoyTrade PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $50 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
- +Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, offering a faster path to funded status.
- +Max funding of $1,024,000 is above the industry average of $839,272.7, providing above-average scaling potential.
- +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation stage easier to pass.
BuoyTrade CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
- −Overall drawdown of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, offering significantly less margin before breach.
- −EA/automated trading is not allowed, restricting algorithmic traders from participating with this firm.
One Step PROS
- +No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for this firm
- +No fee, payout, or structure data provided to evaluate competitiveness
- +No platform or market information is available to assess trading flexibility
- +Firm name suggests a one-step model, but no data is provided to confirm this
One Step CONS
- −No data is provided for this firm, making any meaningful comparison impossible
- −Traders cannot assess profit split, funding, or costs against industry averages
- −Complete absence of data is a significant transparency concern for traders making financial decisions
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy