RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

BuoyTrade vs Genk Capital

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BUOY
BuoyTrade
GENK
Genk Capital
EST. 2010
BUOYTRADE
METRIC
GENK CAPITAL
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
$1,024,000
MAX FUNDING
$50
MIN COST
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

BUOYTRADE DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Static
MARKETS
Forex
PLATFORMS
MT4

GENK CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS
-phase
MARKETS
Equities, Commodities, Digital Assets

BuoyTrade PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of $50 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
  • +Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, offering a faster path to funded status.
  • +Max funding of $1,024,000 is above the industry average of $839,272.7, providing above-average scaling potential.
  • +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation stage easier to pass.

BuoyTrade CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
  • Overall drawdown of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, offering significantly less margin before breach.
  • EA/automated trading is not allowed, restricting algorithmic traders from participating with this firm.

Genk Capital PROS

  • +Founded in 2010, giving Genk Capital over 14 years of operational history and implied institutional experience.
  • +Singapore-based firm operating in one of Asia's most reputable and well-regulated financial hubs.
  • +Covers Equities, Commodities, and Digital Assets, offering access to diverse and distinct asset classes.
  • +Long-established presence may suggest greater financial stability than newer prop firms.

Genk Capital CONS

  • No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is available for industry comparison.
  • Absence of platform information makes it impossible to assess the trading environment.
  • Traders cannot evaluate value or risk parameters without core metrics such as drawdown or profit targets.

PROPDNA VERDICT

BuoyTrade
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
Genk Capital
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

BuoyTrade Full Review →Genk Capital Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy