RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
BuoyTrade vs Eclipse Trading
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
BUOY
BuoyTrade
ECLT
Eclipse Trading
EST. 2007
BUOYTRADE
METRIC
ECLIPSE TRADING
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$1,024,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$50
MIN COST
—
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
BUOYTRADE DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Static
- MARKETS
- Forex
- PLATFORMS
- MT4
ECLIPSE TRADING DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
BuoyTrade PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $50 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
- +Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, offering a faster path to funded status.
- +Max funding of $1,024,000 is above the industry average of $839,272.7, providing above-average scaling potential.
- +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation stage easier to pass.
BuoyTrade CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
- −Overall drawdown of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, offering significantly less margin before breach.
- −EA/automated trading is not allowed, restricting algorithmic traders from participating with this firm.
Eclipse Trading PROS
- +Founded in 2007, making it one of the longest-established firms in the dataset.
- +Country of operation is listed as Hong Kong, indicating an established international presence.
- +Longevity since 2007 suggests operational stability over nearly two decades.
- +Early founding date may indicate experience navigating multiple market cycles.
Eclipse Trading CONS
- −No trading or financial metrics are available to evaluate this firm objectively.
- −Without data on profit split, funding, or costs, no meaningful comparison to industry averages is possible.
- −Traders cannot assess key terms like drawdown, payout speed, or profit targets from available data.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy