RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
BuoyTrade vs Blue Guardian Futures
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
BUOY
BuoyTrade
BGFT
Blue Guardian Futures
BUOYTRADE
METRIC
BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER100%
$1,024,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$450,000
$50BETTER
MIN COST
—$84
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER5d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
BUOYTRADE DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Static
- MARKETS
- Forex
- PLATFORMS
- MT4
BLUE GUARDIAN FUTURES DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts
BuoyTrade PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $50 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly affordable.
- +Single-step funding is better than the industry average of 1.6 steps, offering a faster path to funded status.
- +Max funding of $1,024,000 is above the industry average of $839,272.7, providing above-average scaling potential.
- +Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation stage easier to pass.
BuoyTrade CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
- −Overall drawdown of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, offering significantly less margin before breach.
- −EA/automated trading is not allowed, restricting algorithmic traders from participating with this firm.
Blue Guardian Futures PROS
- +Profit split of 100% is the maximum possible, far exceeding the industry average of 84.7%
- +Min challenge cost of $84 is well below the industry average of $186.70, reducing entry costs
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, offering a streamlined path to capital
- +Days to first payout is 5, slightly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
Blue Guardian Futures CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 3.5% is expressed as a percentage but is exceptionally tight, increasing disqualification risk
- −Max funding of $450,000 is below the industry average of $839,272, limiting maximum earning potential
- −Futures-only market access restricts traders who prefer Forex, Indices, or other asset classes
PROPDNA VERDICT
Blue Guardian Futures
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 5d. 100% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy