RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Bulenox vs V Prop Trader
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
BLNX
Bulenox
EST. 2022
VPRT
V Prop Trader
BULENOX
METRIC
V PROP TRADER
71/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER95%
$150,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$99
MIN COST
—
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER0d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
BULENOX DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Tradovate
- TYPES
- futures
V PROP TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- MARKETS
- Forex, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, VTrader
Bulenox PROS
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation easier to pass.
- +Supports multiple platforms including NinjaTrader, Rithmic, and Tradovate.
- +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted.
Bulenox CONS
- −Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
V Prop Trader PROS
- +Profit split of 95% is significantly above the industry average of 84.7%, maximising trader earnings.
- +Days to first payout of 0 means traders can access profits immediately, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Offers MT5 alongside the proprietary VTrader platform, providing at least one widely recognised trading environment.
- +Covers both Forex and Crypto markets, giving traders access to high-liquidity and high-volatility asset classes.
V Prop Trader CONS
- −No max funding, challenge cost, or drawdown data is provided for comparison against industry averages.
- −Two steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring additional evaluation stages.
- −Limited market coverage of only two asset classes may restrict diversification compared to broader offerings.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy