RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Bulenox vs Savius

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Bulenox
BLNX
Bulenox
EST. 2022
SVUS
Savius
EST. 2013
BULENOX
METRIC
SAVIUS
71/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$150,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$300,000
$99BETTER
MIN COST
—$285
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER3d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

BULENOX DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Rithmic, Tradovate
TYPES
futures

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS
ATAS, Quantower

Bulenox PROS

  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation easier to pass.
  • +Supports multiple platforms including NinjaTrader, Rithmic, and Tradovate.
  • +News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted.

Bulenox CONS

  • −Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.

Savius PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
  • +Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
  • +Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

  • −Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
  • −Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
  • −Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

PROPDNA VERDICT

Bulenox
Higher trust score (71/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.
Savius
Lower trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Bulenox Full Review →Savius Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy