RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Blue Guardian Capital vs The Trading Pit Futures
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
BLGU
Blue Guardian Capital
EST. 2022
TTPF
The Trading Pit Futures
BLUE GUARDIAN CAPITAL
METRIC
THE TRADING PIT FUTURES
71/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
85%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$99
MIN COST
—
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
BLUE GUARDIAN CAPITAL DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex
THE TRADING PIT FUTURES DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
Blue Guardian Capital PROS
- +Profit split of 85% is marginally above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Min challenge cost of $99 is below the industry average of $186.7
- +On-demand payouts offer faster access to profits than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted
Blue Guardian Capital CONS
- −Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
- −Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps
- −No fee refund is offered, meaning challenge costs are non-recoverable
The Trading Pit Futures PROS
- +Based in Liechtenstein, which has a well-regulated financial environment offering potential trader protections.
- +No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
- +No platform or market data is provided to assess trading conditions.
- +No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.
The Trading Pit Futures CONS
- −Almost no operational data is available for The Trading Pit Futures, making comparison impossible.
- −Absence of drawdown, profit split, and funding figures prevents any meaningful evaluation.
- −Note: as a futures firm, drawdown may be expressed in dollar terms and cannot be compared to the 7.9% CFD average.
PROPDNA VERDICT
Blue Guardian Capital
Higher trust score (71/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy