RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blue Guardian Capital vs Genk Capital

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Blue Guardian Capital
BLGU
Blue Guardian Capital
EST. 2022
GENK
Genk Capital
EST. 2010
BLUE GUARDIAN CAPITAL
METRIC
GENK CAPITAL
71/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
85%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$99
MIN COST
—
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

BLUE GUARDIAN CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex

GENK CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS
-phase
MARKETS
Equities, Commodities, Digital Assets

Blue Guardian Capital PROS

  • +Profit split of 85% is marginally above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Min challenge cost of $99 is below the industry average of $186.7
  • +On-demand payouts offer faster access to profits than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted

Blue Guardian Capital CONS

  • −Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
  • −Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps
  • −No fee refund is offered, meaning challenge costs are non-recoverable

Genk Capital PROS

  • +Founded in 2010, giving Genk Capital over 14 years of operational history and implied institutional experience.
  • +Singapore-based firm operating in one of Asia's most reputable and well-regulated financial hubs.
  • +Covers Equities, Commodities, and Digital Assets, offering access to diverse and distinct asset classes.
  • +Long-established presence may suggest greater financial stability than newer prop firms.

Genk Capital CONS

  • −No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is available for industry comparison.
  • −Absence of platform information makes it impossible to assess the trading environment.
  • −Traders cannot evaluate value or risk parameters without core metrics such as drawdown or profit targets.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blue Guardian Capital
Higher trust score (71/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.
Genk Capital
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Blue Guardian Capital Full Review →Genk Capital Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy