RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blue Guardian Capital vs Funderpro

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

Blue Guardian Capital
BLGU
Blue Guardian Capital
EST. 2022
Funderpro
FDRP
Funderpro
EST. 2023
BLUE GUARDIAN CAPITAL
METRIC
FUNDERPRO
71/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—62/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
85%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—80%
$200,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$200,000
$99—
MIN COST
BETTER$79
7d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

BLUE GUARDIAN CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex

FUNDERPRO DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader

Blue Guardian Capital PROS

  • +Profit split of 85% is marginally above the industry average of 84.7%
  • +Min challenge cost of $99 is below the industry average of $186.7
  • +On-demand payouts offer faster access to profits than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted

Blue Guardian Capital CONS

  • −Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
  • −Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps
  • −No fee refund is offered, meaning challenge costs are non-recoverable

Funderpro PROS

  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $79 is well below the industry average of $186.7
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
  • +Four platforms supported (MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader) offering broad trader choice

Funderpro CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
  • −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing traders

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blue Guardian Capital
Higher trust score (71/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.
Funderpro
Lower trust score (62/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Blue Guardian Capital Full Review →Funderpro Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy