RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blue Guardian Capital vs Aqua Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BLGU

Blue Guardian Capital

EST. 2022

AQUA

Aqua Funded

EST. 2023

BLUE GUARDIAN CAPITAL

METRIC

AQUA FUNDED

71/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—54/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

85%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$2,000,000

$99—

MIN COST

BETTER$1

7dTIE

PAYOUT DAYS

TIE7d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

BLUE GUARDIAN CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: forex

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

Blue Guardian Capital PROS

+Profit split of 85% is marginally above the industry average of 84.7%
+Min challenge cost of $99 is below the industry average of $186.7
+On-demand payouts offer faster access to profits than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted

Blue Guardian Capital CONS

−Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
−Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps
−No fee refund is offered, meaning challenge costs are non-recoverable

Aqua Funded PROS

+Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
−Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
−Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blue Guardian Capital

Higher trust score (71/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.

START WITH BLGU