RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Blue Guardian Capital vs Apex Trader Funding
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
BLGU
Blue Guardian Capital
EST. 2022
APEX
Apex Trader Funding
✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2021
BLUE GUARDIAN CAPITAL
METRIC
APEX TRADER FUNDING
71/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—61/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER4/5
85%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$200,000—
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$300,000
$99—
MIN COST
BETTER$35
7dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—8d
—
PASS RATE
31%
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1
BLUE GUARDIAN CAPITAL DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex
APEX TRADER FUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- futures, large-cap
Blue Guardian Capital PROS
- +Profit split of 85% is marginally above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Min challenge cost of $99 is below the industry average of $186.7
- +On-demand payouts offer faster access to profits than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
- +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted
Blue Guardian Capital CONS
- −Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
- −Two steps to funded is slightly above the industry average of 1.6 steps
- −No fee refund is offered, meaning challenge costs are non-recoverable
Apex Trader Funding PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $35 is among the lowest and far below the industry average of $186.7
- +Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
- +Single-step funding is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps
Apex Trader Funding CONS
- −Futures firm uses a dollar-based drawdown structure; overall drawdown percentage is not directly comparable to the 7.9% CFD average
- −Days to first payout of 8 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days
- −Trailing EOD drawdown type is more restrictive than a fixed drawdown structure
PROPDNA VERDICT
Blue Guardian Capital
Higher trust score (71/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.
Apex Trader Funding
Lower trust score (61/100). Slower payouts at 8d. 90% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy