RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blue Guardian vs The Trading Pit Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BLGD

Blue Guardian

TTPF

The Trading Pit Futures

BLUE GUARDIAN

METRIC

THE TRADING PIT FUTURES

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

90%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$400,000

MAX FUNDING

—

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS

STEPS: 3-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Forex, Futures
PLATFORMS: MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

THE TRADING PIT FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Blue Guardian PROS

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
+On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
+Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
+Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes

Blue Guardian CONS

−Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
−No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison

The Trading Pit Futures PROS

+Based in Liechtenstein, which has a well-regulated financial environment offering potential trader protections.
+No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
+No platform or market data is provided to assess trading conditions.
+No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.

The Trading Pit Futures CONS

−Almost no operational data is available for The Trading Pit Futures, making comparison impossible.
−Absence of drawdown, profit split, and funding figures prevents any meaningful evaluation.
−Note: as a futures firm, drawdown may be expressed in dollar terms and cannot be compared to the 7.9% CFD average.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blue Guardian

Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

START WITH BLGD