RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blue Guardian vs Pip Traders Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BLGD
Blue Guardian
PTFD
Pip Traders Funding
BLUE GUARDIAN
METRIC
PIP TRADERS FUNDING
55/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
40/100
3/5BETTER
RATING
0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
MIN COST
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
0

BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS

STEPS
3-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Futures
PLATFORMS
MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

PIP TRADERS FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

Blue Guardian PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
  • +On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
  • +Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
  • +Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes

Blue Guardian CONS

  • Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
  • Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
  • No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison

Pip Traders Funding PROS

  • +The firm name implies a focus on forex funding, which is the most widely traded market globally.
  • +A dedicated funding model suggests a structured approach to trader evaluation and capital allocation.
  • +Pip-based performance naming may indicate a focus on measurable, transparent trading metrics.
  • +Inclusion on a comparison platform indicates some degree of public presence and accountability.

Pip Traders Funding CONS

  • No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective evaluation impossible.
  • Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost data, no industry comparisons can be made.
  • Traders cannot make informed decisions without disclosure of core terms and conditions for this firm.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blue Guardian
Higher trust score (55/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.
Pip Traders Funding
Lower trust score (40/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Blue Guardian Full Review →Pip Traders Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy