RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blue Guardian vs Nino Options

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BLGD
Blue Guardian
NINO
Nino Options
BLUE GUARDIAN
METRIC
NINO OPTIONS
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
—
—
MIN COST
—
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS

STEPS
3-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Futures
PLATFORMS
MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

NINO OPTIONS DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

Blue Guardian PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
  • +On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
  • +Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
  • +Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes

Blue Guardian CONS

  • −Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
  • −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
  • −No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison

Nino Options PROS

  • +No data is available on profit split, funding, or cost metrics for this firm
  • +No data is available on drawdown or profit target for this firm
  • +No data is available on payout timing or steps to funded for this firm
  • +No data is available on platforms, markets, or founding date for this firm

Nino Options CONS

  • −Virtually no data is provided, making any objective evaluation impossible
  • −Traders cannot compare this firm's terms to the industry average of 84.7% profit split
  • −Lack of transparency on key metrics is a significant risk for traders making financial decisions

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blue Guardian
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.
Nino Options
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Blue Guardian Full Review →Nino Options Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy