RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Blue Guardian vs Matrix Executions

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

BLGD
Blue Guardian
MTRX
Matrix Executions
EST. 2018
BLUE GUARDIAN
METRIC
MATRIX EXECUTIONS
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%
PROFIT SPLIT
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
MIN COST
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS

STEPS
3-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing EOD
MARKETS
Forex, Futures
PLATFORMS
MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts

MATRIX EXECUTIONS DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

Blue Guardian PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
  • +On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
  • +Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
  • +Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes

Blue Guardian CONS

  • Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
  • Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
  • No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison

Matrix Executions PROS

  • +Founded in 2018, Matrix Executions has a longer operating history than most prop firms, suggesting stability.
  • +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
  • +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.
  • +No additional data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Matrix Executions.

Matrix Executions CONS

  • Almost no firm data is provided beyond founding year, making meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible.
  • Without profit split, funding, or challenge cost data, traders cannot evaluate value against industry benchmarks.
  • Lack of transparency on payout, drawdown, and trading rules limits trader decision-making confidence significantly.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Blue Guardian
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.
Matrix Executions
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

Blue Guardian Full Review →Matrix Executions Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy