RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Blue Guardian vs Lark Funding
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
BLGD
Blue Guardian
LRKF
Lark Funding
EST. 2022
BLUE GUARDIAN
METRIC
LARK FUNDING
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
90%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—80%
$400,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
—
MIN COST
$200
7d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
BLUE GUARDIAN DETAILS
- STEPS
- 3-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Futures
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, Matchtrader, Tradelocker, Tradovate, ProjectX, Volsys, Deepcharts
LARK FUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
Blue Guardian PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
- +On-demand payout frequency offers maximum withdrawal flexibility
- +Max funding of $400,000 provides substantial capital access for traders
- +Offers both Forex and Futures markets, giving traders access to multiple asset classes
Blue Guardian CONS
- −Three steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less loss tolerance
- −No min challenge cost or profit target data is provided for full comparison
Lark Funding PROS
- +Days to first payout of 1 is exceptionally faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
- +News trading is permitted, giving traders additional strategic flexibility.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $200 is close to the industry average of $186.7, offering a recognizable entry point.
Lark Funding CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation harder to pass.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy